From Stuart Liroff (stuart [at] this address or 408-437-9500 x207):
I’m working for a small (3-people), angel funded startup in downtown S.F. (within easy walking distance from BART). When you hear the names of the investors, it will knock your socks off.
[job description after the jump]Continue reading
In the early 90’s, random dot stereograms made really popular geek posters.
To view them, you had to unfocus your eyes a bit and then stare at infinity. I could never do this so I never saw the fucking giraffes, giraffes fucking, or whatever that others claimed they saw. This caused me to develop quite an elaborate conspiracy theory around the Magic Eye corporation.
When I walk to work, I have this insanely long internal monolog. During a twelve minute walk, I create at least one blog entry I’ll never write and come up with three clever turns of phrases of which maybe I’ll remember one of them in the future and someone will say, “I’ll quote you on that”—but they won’t and we’ll forget it together forever.
However, if you stuck one of those posters in front of me right then, my eyes are so unfocused, I’d probably be able to see the fucking giraffe fucking and finally dispel a conspiracy theory of my youth.
[The Blog Post Who Lived. After the jump.]Continue reading
(For my cousin Alex who asked I blog more often about politics.)
On Obama’s Iowa win:
“Hope could give way to fear once again. But, for tonight at least, it holds a mirror up to the face of America, and we can look at ourselves with pride.…It’s the kind of country we’ve always imagined ourselves being — even if in the last seven years we fell horribly short: a young country, an optimistic country, a forward-looking country, a country not afraid to take risks or to dream big.”
—Ariana Huffington, “Obama Wins Iowa: Why Everyone Has a Reason to Celebrate Tonight”
I mentioned before that I chose the category “religion and politics” because I am a strong believer in the separation of Church and State in the body politic, but never in ourselves.
Our morals inform every decision.
[Fear and Morals, Death and Triumphalism, Silence and Responsibility after the jump]Continue reading
Scott blogs about (Advanced) Dungeons and Dragons and it brings back memories of Sunday School.
…
It was third grade sunday school, We are talking about why we refer to God as “Our Lord.” “Does anyone know what a ‘lord’ is,” the nun asks?
Nobody else knows. I raise my hand.
“Yes, Terry?”
“It’s a tenth level fighter!” I answer.
The whole class freezes… and then bursts out into laughter.
The nun continues, “That may be true, but in the middle ages…”
…
You can bet I had no trouble answering this question in 6th grade social studies segment on feudalism.
Sometimes when we’re most embarrassed is when we learn the most.
(Embarrassed because clearly a fighter becomes a lord at the 9th level, not the 10th. 😉 )
Thank you Dad (and Santa) for giving me the Basic D&D set in the third grade.
I have this box in storage in the South Bay. And people wonder why I don’t clean out my storage?!
I shoot Nikon.
Leica M8, Cosina-Voightlander Nokton 35mm/1.2
1/22sec @ f/2, iso 160, 35mm (47mm)
That doesn’t mean you should shoot it also.
After remembering how camera brand religious wars are waged, I am reminded of this outdated article I wrote—not really that outdated.
Basically in it I point out that, yes, there are differences in camera brands. They’re differences, not “betters.” Or…
“Photons don’t care what logo is on the front of your camera.”
A camera purchase is ultimately a personal decision. The best camera to buy is the camera that speaks to you, not someone else:
“Who is behind the lens? The shutter button only accepts one finger at a time.”
They’re not taking the photo, you are. Grow a pair; make a choice—it’s your choice, not theirs.
And remember, no matter what camera you chose, a camera you’d carry is its most important feature. My favorite saying:
“The best camera to have is the one you have on you.”
…and that advice never will be outdated.
Geez, all these aphorisms make me feel like the Poor Richard of photography. 😉
Leica M8, Cosina-Voightlander Nokton 35mm/1.2
1/10sec, iso 640, 35mm (47mm)
At a party recenty, someone said, “You’re that guy with the expensive camera.” So I guess I put the “poor” in “Poor Richard.”
…because I have facts on my side.
Here is a typical exchange:
Scoble: You put a 24 mm on my camera [Canon 5D] and it’s a 24mm. Put it on a [Nikon] D80, for instance, and it becomes something like a 28mm. (link)
Me: You’re smoking something. A 24mm on a D80 is still a 24mm. The FIELD OF VIEW is like a 36mm on your 5D. (link) The issue you are alluding to with wide angles being better on “full frame cameras” is related to something called retrofocal design. (link)
Scoble: …this shot wouldn’t be the same. (link TRUE). Look at that shot and see the guy to the left? He wouldn’t be there if I was using a non-full-frame sensor camera. (link FALSE)
[An explanation after the jump.]Continue reading
Twice this month I found that I’ve found that I’m a better conversationalist when I’m waiting in line to use the bathroom in those bars, places, or homes that don’t have separate bathrooms by gender.
I guess it’s the combination of boredom, a captive audience, and the need to distract myself from my bladder causes me to strike up a conversation.
It gets me wondering if this is one reason women, who have to endure “the pee line” on an almost daily basis, go to the bathroom in groups.
But mostly it gets me thinking about an obscure piece of Caltech arcana.
In the North Houses, the bathrooms have urinals, stalls, showers and a sink. This makes them impossible to have a locked door/pee line combination. They were designed at a time when the campus was single-gendered (male). When they became multi-gendered, before that balance was anything remotely like a geek event, this represented a big logistical problem.
The solution, I felt, was quite clever. Basically all you needed was an old LP, a nail, and a white-out pen and created the dial-a-gender bathroom:
(I thought the bottom quadrant was quite clever.)
[The death of dial-a-gender after the jump]Continue reading
Just heard something about me that was completely ridiculous and, at the same time, very funny. (I only wish it were true.)
To set the record straight:
> Due to the ergodic hypothesis, social entropy, and a weird lensing effect, it may have appeared at that particular moment that the male-female ratio in my vicinity suffered a slight and short-lived population inversion.
Dave says that everyone eventually has their “supermodel moment” and I guess whatever caused that person to say that comment about me was mine.
Nikon D70, Nikkor 12-24mm f/4G, SB-800, Ultimate Light Box
1/20 sec @ f/4, iso 1250, 12mm (18mm)
I was photographing an event and asked these pretty girls if they wouldn’t mind me taking their picture. After I did, two of them said they’d give me something really worth photographing, which they did multiple times.
This photo appeared on my Facebook feed and Plaxo Pulse, and incidents like this is how rumors about me get started.
Not that I’m complaining!
22 November 2007.
The dishes are being passed around the table: turkey, white and dark meat, cranberry sauce, gravy, mashed potatoes, sweet potato, stuffing, kimchee…
Maybe at your Thanksgiving there is that dish that is not like the others—the one that reminds you that no matter how twinkie you’ve become, there is still a hint of your ethnic heritage you just can’t get rid of.
At the Korean-American Thanksgiving table, that dish is kimchee.
The sight of kimchee reminds me that in the last two decades, this is only my second Thanksgiving spent with the family. I recall the other one…
[Two (first) thanksgivings with the family after the jump]Continue reading
I love Lunch 2.0. It’s ironic that something that started as a prank on Web 2.0 could become representative of the very thing it teases: free and open communication and “the lunch as a conversation.”
Even though I missed Lunch 2.0 at Oodle, you have to love this mobile post via Utterz by Chris Heuer catching the first words of this utter by Randy Corke of Utterz, talking at Lunch 2.0 to Devon Holmes about social media.
Now that’s so meta. 🙂
I wish I could have jumped in on the social media circle jerk. Of course, I’m not as hip as them so I went “old skool” and twittered it. You see these sort of random circular connections in my blog posts, so I obviously love it.
Lunch 2.0. It’s been a great year.
Nikon D200, Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G VR, SB-800, Gitzo G1228LVL, RRS BH-55 ballhead
1/100 sec @ f/16, iso 100, 26mm (39mm)
Lunch 2.0 makes the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle. Believe it or not, this is how we got a Facebook Lunch 2.0.
I thought I’d finish with how this last Silicon Lunch 2.0 of 2007 incident is a great way to close out the year, which began with the linked blog post above about how we created Lunch 2.0.
[Epicycles and thanks after the jump]Continue reading