<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista is not a copy of Mac OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml</link>
	<description>You tell that other boy, not to touch the woodwork...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Junk Waffle</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml#comment-28183</link>
		<dc:creator>Junk Waffle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml#comment-28183</guid>
		<description>Nice work, OSX.0 was pretty lame and didn't even look that good compared to 10.4, but hey, even then i knew it was going to be great. It was apple!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, OSX.0 was pretty lame and didn&#8217;t even look that good compared to 10.4, but hey, even then i knew it was going to be great. It was apple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml#comment-14203</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml#comment-14203</guid>
		<description>If there's one brutal truth to learn in Silicon Valley it is that it takes more than great engineering and great technology to make great products. Microsoft's shortcomings and (relative) failures haven't usually come from poor engineering. Vista is an unusual case where people are pointing their fingers at the engineers for slipping the dates by so long , etc. I don't know if that is fair or not. 

Apple has proven that even bad engineering and technology can be overcome. The first couple of versions of OSX were complete crap. I still their scheduler and threading leave a lot to be desired. But OSX still had enough good ideas in it that you could excuse a lot of the poor execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s one brutal truth to learn in Silicon Valley it is that it takes more than great engineering and great technology to make great products. Microsoft&#8217;s shortcomings and (relative) failures haven&#8217;t usually come from poor engineering. Vista is an unusual case where people are pointing their fingers at the engineers for slipping the dates by so long , etc. I don&#8217;t know if that is fair or not. </p>
<p>Apple has proven that even bad engineering and technology can be overcome. The first couple of versions of OSX were complete crap. I still their scheduler and threading leave a lot to be desired. But OSX still had enough good ideas in it that you could excuse a lot of the poor execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry chay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml#comment-14150</link>
		<dc:creator>terry chay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml#comment-14150</guid>
		<description>Rob. Great point. Also they built their infrastructure on Solaris and are probably organized significantly differently. That’s why I said they may be the exception that proves the rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob. Great point. Also they built their infrastructure on Solaris and are probably organized significantly differently. That’s why I said they may be the exception that proves the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml#comment-14121</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/windows-vista-is-not-a-copy-of-mac-os-x.shtml#comment-14121</guid>
		<description>Hotmail was bought by MS when it was the market leader...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hotmail was bought by MS when it was the market leader&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
