Comments on: Nikon’s compact digital (S)uccessor http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml You tell that other boy, not to touch the woodwork... Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:13:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage hourly 1 By: tychay http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-6507 tychay Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:36:28 +0000 http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-6507 The Online Photographer <a href="http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/2006/09/whither-r-1.html" rel="nofollow">has an article about the R1</a> with a mention of the S10 and the idea of swivel formfactors in general. Read the comments there. A lot of good photographers don’t want to see the swivel die. The Online Photographer has an article about the R1 with a mention of the S10 and the idea of swivel formfactors in general.

Read the comments there. A lot of good photographers don’t want to see the swivel die.

]]> By: tychay http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-6224 tychay Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:18:44 +0000 http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-6224 Well the reason not a dSLR has probably to do with the reflex mirror negating the ability for live LCD preview without some serious compromises. However, I agree with the spirit of your view. Why no pro-level 995 sequel? Well the reason not a dSLR has probably to do with the reflex mirror negating the ability for live LCD preview without some serious compromises.

However, I agree with the spirit of your view. Why no pro-level 995 sequel?

]]> By: Adam http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-6140 Adam Fri, 01 Sep 2006 05:39:35 +0000 http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-6140 Damn... sooo close. I've got a 995 and I love the swivel feature, and that I can screw on any 37mm (or 28mm w adapter) lens; I don't want to give up my truley amazing fisheye. But I need to step up the resolution and the VR would be awesome for those crazy weird angle quick snaps. Why can't Nikon make a pro dSLR w/ the swivel?!? Damn… sooo close. I’ve got a 995 and I love the swivel feature, and that I can screw on any 37mm (or 28mm w adapter) lens; I don’t want to give up my truley amazing fisheye. But I need to step up the resolution and the VR would be awesome for those crazy weird angle quick snaps. Why can’t Nikon make a pro dSLR w/ the swivel?!?

]]> By: Michael Hanscom http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-5774 Michael Hanscom Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:40:50 +0000 http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-5774 Perhaps that's because there is no VR in the S4 -- essentially its Achilles heel. If the VR in the S10 (however they do it) works well, it should do quite nicely...the camera shop I work at has a lot of people looking for a compact high-zoom camera interested in the S4 except for the lack of VR. Perhaps that’s because there is no VR in the S4 — essentially its Achilles heel. If the VR in the S10 (however they do it) works well, it should do quite nicely…the camera shop I work at has a lot of people looking for a compact high-zoom camera interested in the S4 except for the lack of VR.

]]> By: Tracer http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-5771 Tracer Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:26:43 +0000 http://terrychay.com/blog/article/nikon-compact-digital-successor.shtml#comment-5771 I've tried out the S4 extensivly here in the office. The VR in that thing is more than useless. The only thing it seems to do is drain your battery faster. Maybe this will be more successfull. I’ve tried out the S4 extensivly here in the office.
The VR in that thing is more than useless. The only thing it seems to do is drain your battery faster. Maybe this will be more successfull.

]]>