<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: His conversion is almost complete</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml</link>
	<description>You tell that other boy, not to touch the woodwork...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Lunch 2.0 story so far</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-71172</link>
		<dc:creator>The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Lunch 2.0 story so far</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-71172</guid>
		<description>[...] Haiping hangs up the phone. Out comes these words in his wonderfully stilted chinese accent that reminds me of the professor of my Linear Circuit Analysis class: “Man! I was just going to have lunch with my friend at Google, and he got fired!” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Haiping hangs up the phone. Out comes these words in his wonderfully stilted chinese accent that reminds me of the professor of my Linear Circuit Analysis class: “Man! I was just going to have lunch with my friend at Google, and he got fired!” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-45892</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-45892</guid>
		<description>Because you don't understand that security and privacy is not binary.

 Just the fact that it &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; possible to make a &lt;b&gt;guess&lt;/b&gt;, doesn’t mean it is insecure. I put the bar as high as it is to get this information through other means, if not higher. It is certainly blurry enough for the casual observer; it certainly can’t be captcha’d.

For instance, why don’t you search for his name on Google and find one e-mail address. Then add it to Plaxo and see if you don’t get all the information above? Then compare this to my blurring. Which was easier? Now that you know the information, which was more accurate? (I’ll bet that your initial guess of the data on the right is incorrect.)

Does the fact that the answer to both is the latter make my blurring “sufficient”? I believe so. People like you may live in an absolute world in your own isolation, and thus there is only a single right way and many wrong ways. People like me believe “reasonable doubt” doesn’t mean “any doubt”—most statements in the world have some built-in statistical error component and there exists nothing that can reduce Type I error without Type II consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because you don&#8217;t understand that security and privacy is not binary.</p>
<p> Just the fact that it <b>is</b> possible to make a <b>guess</b>, doesn’t mean it is insecure. I put the bar as high as it is to get this information through other means, if not higher. It is certainly blurry enough for the casual observer; it certainly can’t be captcha’d.</p>
<p>For instance, why don’t you search for his name on Google and find one e-mail address. Then add it to Plaxo and see if you don’t get all the information above? Then compare this to my blurring. Which was easier? Now that you know the information, which was more accurate? (I’ll bet that your initial guess of the data on the right is incorrect.)</p>
<p>Does the fact that the answer to both is the latter make my blurring “sufficient”? I believe so. People like you may live in an absolute world in your own isolation, and thus there is only a single right way and many wrong ways. People like me believe “reasonable doubt” doesn’t mean “any doubt”—most statements in the world have some built-in statistical error component and there exists nothing that can reduce Type I error without Type II consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-45829</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-45829</guid>
		<description>So, I don't get it. You take someone else's info, post it to your blog, and only blur it because you're pretending to care? Then again, I suppose it only matters if he cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I don&#8217;t get it. You take someone else&#8217;s info, post it to your blog, and only blur it because you&#8217;re pretending to care? Then again, I suppose it only matters if he cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-45447</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-45447</guid>
		<description>I feel it is sufficent enough given that the stuff on the left is outdated, the information on the right is publically accessible, and I don't think people will go to great lengths to try permutations to guess the stuff on the right (which isn't as obvious as you make it out to be, trust me).

Then again, I don't wear a tin foil hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel it is sufficent enough given that the stuff on the left is outdated, the information on the right is publically accessible, and I don&#8217;t think people will go to great lengths to try permutations to guess the stuff on the right (which isn&#8217;t as obvious as you make it out to be, trust me).</p>
<p>Then again, I don&#8217;t wear a tin foil hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-45432</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/his-conversion-is-almost-complete.shtml#comment-45432</guid>
		<description>Your blurring is insufficient to obscure.... if you want the information removed, DELETE it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blurring is insufficient to obscure&#8230;. if you want the information removed, DELETE it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
