<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: G7 hoopla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml</link>
	<description>You tell that other boy, not to touch the woodwork...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8-bleeding-edge</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-431047</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml#comment-431047</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think the G9 does. And I've been telling people that it is an excellent camera. The reviews, too, bear this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think the G9 does. And I&#8217;ve been telling people that it is an excellent camera. The reviews, too, bear this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-429922</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml#comment-429922</guid>
		<description>so now that G7 has CHDK RAW-capable then what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so now that G7 has CHDK RAW-capable then what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-149368</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml#comment-149368</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/g_series/canon-releases-powershot-g9-291145.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Canon brings back RAW support in the G9&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/g_series/canon-releases-powershot-g9-291145.php" rel="nofollow">Canon brings back RAW support in the G9</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XL BRAIN</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-54786</link>
		<dc:creator>XL BRAIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 04:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml#comment-54786</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more with this article.  I actually bought this camera, and took it back after finding out it didn't support RAW...  What is the point, since you can get the PANASONIC for less with all of the features...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more with this article.  I actually bought this camera, and took it back after finding out it didn&#8217;t support RAW&#8230;  What is the point, since you can get the PANASONIC for less with all of the features&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-15555</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 07:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml#comment-15555</guid>
		<description>PhotographyBlog has &lt;a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_canon_powershot_g7.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;a review of the Canon Powershot G7&lt;/a&gt;.

Conclusion: “The Canon Powershot G7 is the kind of camera that not only makes you feel like a better photographer, but helps you become one too…”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PhotographyBlog has <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_canon_powershot_g7.php" rel="nofollow">a review of the Canon Powershot G7</a>.</p>
<p>Conclusion: “The Canon Powershot G7 is the kind of camera that not only makes you feel like a better photographer, but helps you become one too…”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-14393</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml#comment-14393</guid>
		<description>This week’s &lt;a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/index.php/weblog/comments/garys_parries_17_12_06/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Gary’s Parries&lt;/a&gt; besides agreeing with the basic premise of this article points ut that the G-series was previously “discontinued” and that another feature that got dropped from the G5 was the flip-out/twist LCD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week’s <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/index.php/weblog/comments/garys_parries_17_12_06/" rel="nofollow">Gary’s Parries</a> besides agreeing with the basic premise of this article points ut that the G-series was previously “discontinued” and that another feature that got dropped from the G5 was the flip-out/twist LCD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-13297</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/g7-hoopla.shtml#comment-13297</guid>
		<description>In the latest issue of &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.phototechmag.com/" title="Photo Techniques Magazine" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Photo Techniques&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;, there is an article “Measuring Digital Dynamic Range” by &lt;a href="http://www.edbergphoto.com/" title="THimothy Edberg" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Timothy Edberg&lt;/a&gt;.

You’ll have to pick up this magazine to get to the meat of the article. The relevant part here is he Timothy measures the dynamic range of the Canon Powershot G6, which has RAW capability. At the lowest ISO 50, the measured usable dynamic range is 10 f-stops for RAW, and 7 2/3 for JPEG. At ISO 400, he gets 5 2/3 f-stops for JPEG. (Smaller sensors have a larger drop off of usable DR at higher ISO.)

As I explained above, there is almost no difference due to the increase megapixel between the G6 and G7. I think the conclusions show two things:

1) RAW has more usable dynamic range than the best JPEG at the lowest ISO in the G7
2) One can speculate how almost worthless the signal-noise is at the high ISOs: 1600 and 3200 on the G7.

Meaning that the inclusion of high ISO in the G7 is pure marketing. The exclusion of RAW in the G7 is pure business (selling more dSLRs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest issue of <cite><a href="http://www.phototechmag.com/" title="Photo Techniques Magazine" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Photo Techniques</a></cite>, there is an article “Measuring Digital Dynamic Range” by <a href="http://www.edbergphoto.com/" title="THimothy Edberg" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Timothy Edberg</a>.</p>
<p>You’ll have to pick up this magazine to get to the meat of the article. The relevant part here is he Timothy measures the dynamic range of the Canon Powershot G6, which has RAW capability. At the lowest ISO 50, the measured usable dynamic range is 10 f-stops for RAW, and 7 2/3 for JPEG. At ISO 400, he gets 5 2/3 f-stops for JPEG. (Smaller sensors have a larger drop off of usable DR at higher ISO.)</p>
<p>As I explained above, there is almost no difference due to the increase megapixel between the G6 and G7. I think the conclusions show two things:</p>
<p>1) RAW has more usable dynamic range than the best JPEG at the lowest ISO in the G7<br />
2) One can speculate how almost worthless the signal-noise is at the high ISOs: 1600 and 3200 on the G7.</p>
<p>Meaning that the inclusion of high ISO in the G7 is pure marketing. The exclusion of RAW in the G7 is pure business (selling more dSLRs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
