<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who really never gets anything?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml</link>
	<description>You tell that other boy, not to touch the woodwork...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Advocates of Single-Payer</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml#comment-394306</link>
		<dc:creator>The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Advocates of Single-Payer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/?p=12#comment-394306</guid>
		<description>[...] Disclaimer: I may be personally biased against WalMart. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Disclaimer: I may be personally biased against WalMart. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spontaneous Drinking</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml#comment-206733</link>
		<dc:creator>The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spontaneous Drinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/?p=12#comment-206733</guid>
		<description>[...] I’m hoping that when we actually have an event, we could try to empirically verify the Ballmer Peak:  xkcd’s graph of the Ballmer peak: “I call long tail!” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’m hoping that when we actually have an event, we could try to empirically verify the Ballmer Peak:  xkcd’s graph of the Ballmer peak: “I call long tail!” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a "different" foreigner</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>a "different" foreigner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/?p=12#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Carl, I agree.

The article's rant shows shows that he's just another xenophobic american who doesn't realize how inferior his country is. It's people like him that are polluting our internet by posting articles on his own server.

About the only thing I agree with is how he constantly rips on the Japs. God, I hate xenophobic Americans and Japs! What a whining bunch of cultural imperialists they are!

Americans like the poster don't understand that the intricacies of our superior legal system. I heard their barristers don't even wear wigs to court!

pathetic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, I agree.</p>
<p>The article&#8217;s rant shows shows that he&#8217;s just another xenophobic american who doesn&#8217;t realize how inferior his country is. It&#8217;s people like him that are polluting our internet by posting articles on his own server.</p>
<p>About the only thing I agree with is how he constantly rips on the Japs. God, I hate xenophobic Americans and Japs! What a whining bunch of cultural imperialists they are!</p>
<p>Americans like the poster don&#8217;t understand that the intricacies of our superior legal system. I heard their barristers don&#8217;t even wear wigs to court!</p>
<p>pathetic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irregular Joe</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Irregular Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/?p=12#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Carl, I pretty much agree, but it is not exactly a useless diatribe.

This article does demonstrate the wave of xenophobia and ignorance that seems to be growing these days.

The author does not appear to understand the trade issues involved nor does he appear to be able to form a coherent argument.

sad...


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, I pretty much agree, but it is not exactly a useless diatribe.</p>
<p>This article does demonstrate the wave of xenophobia and ignorance that seems to be growing these days.</p>
<p>The author does not appear to understand the trade issues involved nor does he appear to be able to form a coherent argument.</p>
<p>sad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One of the Foreigners</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>One of the Foreigners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/?p=12#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Carl, I agree "Lame and Useless Diatribe" just about sums this up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, I agree &#8220;Lame and Useless Diatribe&#8221; just about sums this up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry chay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>terry chay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/?p=12#comment-56</guid>
		<description>No, the term "foreigners" was grammatically incorrect, I should have used the singular. Its use was "expedient" not "poor form" since I'm referring to anyone outside the United States in reference to Apple. If I wanted to be politically correct I'd suppose I'd say something like "everyone not living in the United States who doesn't regularly get packages from someone in the prospective country."

The sentence was an obvious over-generalization and just as obviously touched a nerve. I guess you are one of the people whining about how you couldn't purchase any music from iTunes Music Store and then suing Apple for their "anti-competitive DRM" when they finally did secure the licensing to come out with it in your country, over-late and overpriced.

The point of this article was that if something is popular enough, it does make it across from one country to another. Nobody should bother bitching about those things. I could care less about Friends DVDs or Final Fantasy X International Edition and I can wait for a PSP or a cell phone that I don't need. I'm bitching about the things that don't make it from one country to another, not because "foreigners" are servicing their domestic market first, but simply because the target market is too vertical.

I chose an example of something from Japan that you can't find in the U.S. or Europe because there is "no market" for it. I could have easily chosen something in the United States that you can't get in Europe if I could think of anything. I don't know what we have here that you want and will never get because the it is a long tail item. Maybe it's Hummel figurines. In your case it's probably an effective MAO inhibitor.

The internet was supposed to fix this--it obviously hasn't. Instead, because of the Internet, we now KNOW about these things (but we still can't get them).

E-commerce was about selling into the long tail. Prima facia, the reason this hasn't happenned is because the cost of importation. Wasn't globalization and free trade supposed to solve this? Instead of catering to the long tail, efficient trade has solved the problem if providing me the same mediocre desk at work that I have at home, even though they were purchased at completely different times by different people. Thanks Ikea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the term &#8220;foreigners&#8221; was grammatically incorrect, I should have used the singular. Its use was &#8220;expedient&#8221; not &#8220;poor form&#8221; since I&#8217;m referring to anyone outside the United States in reference to Apple. If I wanted to be politically correct I&#8217;d suppose I&#8217;d say something like &#8220;everyone not living in the United States who doesn&#8217;t regularly get packages from someone in the prospective country.&#8221;</p>
<p>The sentence was an obvious over-generalization and just as obviously touched a nerve. I guess you are one of the people whining about how you couldn&#8217;t purchase any music from iTunes Music Store and then suing Apple for their &#8220;anti-competitive DRM&#8221; when they finally did secure the licensing to come out with it in your country, over-late and overpriced.</p>
<p>The point of this article was that if something is popular enough, it does make it across from one country to another. Nobody should bother bitching about those things. I could care less about Friends DVDs or Final Fantasy X International Edition and I can wait for a PSP or a cell phone that I don&#8217;t need. I&#8217;m bitching about the things that don&#8217;t make it from one country to another, not because &#8220;foreigners&#8221; are servicing their domestic market first, but simply because the target market is too vertical.</p>
<p>I chose an example of something from Japan that you can&#8217;t find in the U.S. or Europe because there is &#8220;no market&#8221; for it. I could have easily chosen something in the United States that you can&#8217;t get in Europe if I could think of anything. I don&#8217;t know what we have here that you want and will never get because the it is a long tail item. Maybe it&#8217;s Hummel figurines. In your case it&#8217;s probably an effective MAO inhibitor.</p>
<p>The internet was supposed to fix this&#8211;it obviously hasn&#8217;t. Instead, because of the Internet, we now KNOW about these things (but we still can&#8217;t get them).</p>
<p>E-commerce was about selling into the long tail. Prima facia, the reason this hasn&#8217;t happenned is because the cost of importation. Wasn&#8217;t globalization and free trade supposed to solve this? Instead of catering to the long tail, efficient trade has solved the problem if providing me the same mediocre desk at work that I have at home, even though they were purchased at completely different times by different people. Thanks Ikea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/design-internet-and-the-long-tail-failure.shtml#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/?p=12#comment-55</guid>
		<description>What a lame and useless diatribe. So you are bitching about a few people in Europe who complain about limited access to technology, and at the same time, recognize that Americans do it more often. What a moron.
BTW, the term "foreigners" is considered poor form. Ignorant even. Still, perhaps the foreigners should expect this from an American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a lame and useless diatribe. So you are bitching about a few people in Europe who complain about limited access to technology, and at the same time, recognize that Americans do it more often. What a moron.<br />
BTW, the term &#8220;foreigners&#8221; is considered poor form. Ignorant even. Still, perhaps the foreigners should expect this from an American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
