<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D70 sequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml</link>
	<description>You tell that other boy, not to touch the woodwork...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Three new dSLRs and “camera feel”</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-6115</link>
		<dc:creator>The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Three new dSLRs and “camera feel”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-6115</guid>
		<description>[...] the Nikon D80 ($1000) with AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED kit lens ($1300); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Nikon D80 ($1000) with AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED kit lens ($1300); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4886</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d80.htm" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;rumors are out&lt;/a&gt; and there are some corrections to my guesses I should mention.

First, it is the D80, not the D90. I suspected as much, but the site I linked called it the D90.

Second, it takes SD cards. I didn’t think about that. Smart move on Nikon’s part when you consider the target market (first time buyers, not SD50/D70 owners, you’re supposed to upgrade to the D200 or D200s like I did).

Third, frame rate increases to 4.5fps. Wow! This makes the 30D look like a joke.

Fourth, Works with AI and AI-S lenses. Strange, I would have thought this is uselesss for the target market and they'd have kept this for the D200.

Fifth, Addition of the AF button on the top. I like that (right now you have to dig through the menus in the D70), but I don't like the placement on the top. The way the D200 does it is much smarter (it overloads the AF/MF MF switch with C S M and separates the shutter/aperture priority into a customizeable menu setting). Welcome addition though.

Sixth, Where is the BKT button? I suppose people will use the extra-function button on the front to deal with the lack of the BKT button on the back. Frustrating.

Other than that, my guesses appear to be right.

BTW, I missed the Canon-fanboy frame that they’re touting. Basically &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/26/nikon-d80-pics-revealed/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;they’re claiming&lt;/a&gt; that it is noisy at High ISOs (by comparing this to the $3000 5D no less).

Hey, Canon idiots: the D50 has less noise than the Rebel XT. What says that Nikon won't do something similar with the D80 and include aggressive optical de-noising and hot mirrors in order to get a “review win”?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d80.htm" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">rumors are out</a> and there are some corrections to my guesses I should mention.</p>
<p>First, it is the D80, not the D90. I suspected as much, but the site I linked called it the D90.</p>
<p>Second, it takes SD cards. I didn’t think about that. Smart move on Nikon’s part when you consider the target market (first time buyers, not SD50/D70 owners, you’re supposed to upgrade to the D200 or D200s like I did).</p>
<p>Third, frame rate increases to 4.5fps. Wow! This makes the 30D look like a joke.</p>
<p>Fourth, Works with AI and AI-S lenses. Strange, I would have thought this is uselesss for the target market and they&#8217;d have kept this for the D200.</p>
<p>Fifth, Addition of the AF button on the top. I like that (right now you have to dig through the menus in the D70), but I don&#8217;t like the placement on the top. The way the D200 does it is much smarter (it overloads the AF/MF MF switch with C S M and separates the shutter/aperture priority into a customizeable menu setting). Welcome addition though.</p>
<p>Sixth, Where is the BKT button? I suppose people will use the extra-function button on the front to deal with the lack of the BKT button on the back. Frustrating.</p>
<p>Other than that, my guesses appear to be right.</p>
<p>BTW, I missed the Canon-fanboy frame that they’re touting. Basically <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/26/nikon-d80-pics-revealed/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">they’re claiming</a> that it is noisy at High ISOs (by comparing this to the $3000 5D no less).</p>
<p>Hey, Canon idiots: the D50 has less noise than the Rebel XT. What says that Nikon won&#8217;t do something similar with the D80 and include aggressive optical de-noising and hot mirrors in order to get a “review win”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carpeicthus</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4789</link>
		<dc:creator>carpeicthus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4789</guid>
		<description>Already got one. I'll take a 16mm f/2 DX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already got one. I&#8217;ll take a 16mm f/2 DX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4785</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4785</guid>
		<description>Nikon usually announces a lens to go along with the new body. &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikkor/discuss/72157594205551774/" rel="nofollow"&gt;This thread started by carpeicthus&lt;/a&gt; tries to take bets on what it will be.

(BTW, I agree with Ryan, it’s probably a 70-300 small aperture VR. It seems like a perfect complement to the 18-70mm typically sold with the kit. I think the reason the other Nikkor folks aren’t behind this is because we’re lens snobs who don’t want to hear about a lens none of us plan to buy. We want a 30mm DX prime. :-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon usually announces a lens to go along with the new body. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikkor/discuss/72157594205551774/" rel="nofollow">This thread started by carpeicthus</a> tries to take bets on what it will be.</p>
<p>(BTW, I agree with Ryan, it’s probably a 70-300 small aperture VR. It seems like a perfect complement to the 18-70mm typically sold with the kit. I think the reason the other Nikkor folks aren’t behind this is because we’re lens snobs who don’t want to hear about a lens none of us plan to buy. We want a 30mm DX prime. :-))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4782</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4782</guid>
		<description>Their ad campaign has a grammatical error, read this thread at dpreview.com: &lt;a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&#38;message=19271940" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&#38;message=19271940&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their ad campaign has a grammatical error, read this thread at dpreview.com: <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&amp;message=19271940" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&amp;message=19271940</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carpeicthus</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4780</link>
		<dc:creator>carpeicthus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/d70-sequel.shtml#comment-4780</guid>
		<description>I didn't even think to look at the Canon fanatic reaction on DPreview. Half of them are saying "8MP is better!" and the other half are saying "Canon will have 12MP next week!" Ah, cognitive dissonance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t even think to look at the Canon fanatic reaction on DPreview. Half of them are saying &#8220;8MP is better!&#8221; and the other half are saying &#8220;Canon will have 12MP next week!&#8221; Ah, cognitive dissonance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
