<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A one party country</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml</link>
	<description>You tell that other boy, not to touch the woodwork...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8-bleeding-edge</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Politics (and Humor)</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-1795</link>
		<dc:creator>The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Politics (and Humor)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml#comment-1795</guid>
		<description>[...] Today we salute you Mr. anonymous put-down chalker. 1 Though Rikk might be very interested in the â€œWin a Trip with Thomas Freidman.â€ Anyway, despite Tom Friedmanâ€™s recent conversion and Iâ€™m in agreement with many of the things said in his interview with Terry Gross, Iâ€™m still of the opinion that he is a libertarian nitjob, not qualified to talk about economics. The only columnist at the Times worth his salt is Princeton economist, Paul Krugman. You can take that fact to the bank. 2True to my word, I stopped reading the New York Times Op-Ed when they started charging. I picked up the Washington Post, but am in the process of dropping them because their idiot ombudsman feels that her job is to act as a mouthpiece of the Post instead of one of itâ€™s readers. Iâ€™m keeping Dan Froomkinâ€™s â€œWhite House Briefingâ€ because it is an excellent summary of the issues. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today we salute you Mr. anonymous put-down chalker. 1 Though Rikk might be very interested in the â€œWin a Trip with Thomas Freidman.â€ Anyway, despite Tom Friedmanâ€™s recent conversion and Iâ€™m in agreement with many of the things said in his interview with Terry Gross, Iâ€™m still of the opinion that he is a libertarian nitjob, not qualified to talk about economics. The only columnist at the Times worth his salt is Princeton economist, Paul Krugman. You can take that fact to the bank. 2True to my word, I stopped reading the New York Times Op-Ed when they started charging. I picked up the Washington Post, but am in the process of dropping them because their idiot ombudsman feels that her job is to act as a mouthpiece of the Post instead of one of itâ€™s readers. Iâ€™m keeping Dan Froomkinâ€™s â€œWhite House Briefingâ€ because it is an excellent summary of the issues. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TimesSelect&#8217;s first 150k</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TimesSelect&#8217;s first 150k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been pessimistic about the enterprise. So let&#8217;s look at this another way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&rsquo;ve been pessimistic about the enterprise. So let&rsquo;s look at this another way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TimesSelect thought of the day</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TimesSelect thought of the day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml#comment-802</guid>
		<description>[...] As I mentioned earlier the Op-Ed articles which are behind TimeSelect paid-for subscriptions. I noticed that they have nearly completely fallen out of the Time&#8217;s &#8220;Most e-mailed&#8221; newsfeed. Before it seemed that over half the Op-Eds would be on this feed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I mentioned earlier the Op-Ed articles which are behind TimeSelect paid-for subscriptions. I noticed that they have nearly completely fallen out of the Time&rsquo;s &ldquo;Most e-mailed&rdquo; newsfeed. Before it seemed that over half the Op-Eds would be on this feed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml#comment-698</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/19/AR2005101902254_pf.html" title="Profit Plummets At N.Y. Times Co.â€”Washington Post" rel="nofollow"&gt;NYT profits are going down&lt;/a&gt;. I guess TimesSelect was in anticipation to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/19/AR2005101902254_pf.html" title="Profit Plummets At N.Y. Times Co.â€”Washington Post" rel="nofollow">NYT profits are going down</a>. I guess TimesSelect was in anticipation to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Bill Keller decides &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/print/bwdaily/dnflash/oct2005/nf20051010_7117_db042.htm?chan=db" title="All the News That's Fit to Dis" rel="nofollow"&gt;to throw stones from his glass house&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/clueless-in-phoenix_b_8640.html" title="Clueless in Phoenixâ€”Arianna Huffington" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ouch!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Keller decides <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/print/bwdaily/dnflash/oct2005/nf20051010_7117_db042.htm?chan=db" title="All the News That's Fit to Dis" rel="nofollow">to throw stones from his glass house</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/clueless-in-phoenix_b_8640.html" title="Clueless in Phoenixâ€”Arianna Huffington" rel="nofollow">Ouch!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml#comment-654</guid>
		<description>The New York Times has an article today about &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/10/business/10paper.html?ex=1286596800&#38;en=51bfa54237a0d8bd&#38;ei=5088&#38;partner=rssnyt&#38;emc=rss" title="At Newspapers, Some Clippingâ€”New York Times" rel="nofollow"&gt;the demise of print newspapers&lt;/a&gt;.

I think this is why they put the Op-Ed behind TimesSelect. There is no way to compete on general news because of the internet. Still the problem of opinions is one of exposure, and NYT is losing it.

Wonder if TV News will follow the same course? Right now you see a lot of "investigative reporting" because it is cheap to produce, but perhaps that is next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times has an article today about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/10/business/10paper.html?ex=1286596800&amp;en=51bfa54237a0d8bd&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss" title="At Newspapers, Some Clippingâ€”New York Times" rel="nofollow">the demise of print newspapers</a>.</p>
<p>I think this is why they put the Op-Ed behind TimesSelect. There is no way to compete on general news because of the internet. Still the problem of opinions is one of exposure, and NYT is losing it.</p>
<p>Wonder if TV News will follow the same course? Right now you see a lot of &#8220;investigative reporting&#8221; because it is cheap to produce, but perhaps that is next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml#comment-600</guid>
		<description>So it begins.

&lt;a href="http://www.pkarchive.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;PKArchive&lt;/a&gt; got a cease-and-desist letter so that ends &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; gravy train.

It is strange that WSJ provides its columns for free and charges for the content, while NYT does the reverse. I think the right has it right here, but weâ€™ll see.

In the mean time, Iâ€™m not going to be linking NYT Op-Eds. Not in protest, mind you, but because it is unfair to be linking password protected content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it begins.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pkarchive.org/" rel="nofollow">PKArchive</a> got a cease-and-desist letter so that ends <b>that</b> gravy train.</p>
<p>It is strange that WSJ provides its columns for free and charges for the content, while NYT does the reverse. I think the right has it right here, but weâ€™ll see.</p>
<p>In the mean time, Iâ€™m not going to be linking NYT Op-Eds. Not in protest, mind you, but because it is unfair to be linking password protected content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tychay</title>
		<link>http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>tychay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrychay.com/blog/article/a-one-party-country.shtml#comment-593</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.johntabin.com/neverpayretail/" title="Never Pay Retail" rel="nofollow"&gt;Never Pay Retail&lt;/a&gt; is a blog devoted to finding publicly accessible versions of the New York Times Op-Ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.johntabin.com/neverpayretail/" title="Never Pay Retail" rel="nofollow">Never Pay Retail</a> is a blog devoted to finding publicly accessible versions of the New York Times Op-Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
